First, there was the troubling news about the SF Chronicle. Then Scoble made a ridiculous, uninformed hyperbole claiming “newspapers are dead.” I’ve already written about the inability of “newspapers are dead” (NAD) crowd to intelligently analyze the newspaper industry. Some people are looking at ways to save newspapers. The newspaper industry is facing a transition, not its death.
Let’s look at some FACTS about the industry
Here are the facts (ref, ref2, ref3, ref4):
- Newspapers are a $59 billion industry in North America
- In the US, advertising growth is flat, with online growth (up 35% Y/Y) covering the loss (down 2%) in revenue from print
- Baby boomers have spending power of $2 trillion and 52% read a newspaper on a daily basis
- In 2005, US dailies had a 53 million Weekday circulation and a 55 million Sunday circulation, representing a change from 1960 of -9.4% and +15.9%, respectively
- Newspapers control 19% of the total advertising market in the US
- Larger dailies sell for 10 to 14X EBITDA and we have seen most transactions occur at the high end of this range
Newspapers are NOT dead and will adapt
Sure, print subscription is in slow decline, but niche properties and constantly changing demographics will always provide support. Local newspapers will always be an authority on the news for their given geography. Newspaper reporting contributes to the vast majority of news. Online is another medium and distribution method. It will not kill off newspapers. Newspapers survived Radio, Television and they will survive the Internet. They will adapt with the internet and demonstrate the value of their demographics and advertising relationships.
Newspapers have an incredible amount of value
I’m very glad no one in the NAD crowd is an executive or has enough money to buy newspapers. They would waste our time as advisors. We know for a fact that newspapers are valuable because we’ve sold newspapers to every major company in the industry. When private equity folks call us and tell us they are looking for newspapers at 3 to 5X EBITDA range, we have to laugh and have to tell them the truth.
People who analyze the industry with tunnel-vision and broad sweeping generalizations scream uninformed and demonstrate an inability to correctly understand an industry that HAS value.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 25, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Howard Owens
As I and Howard Weaver have said: It’s the end of monopoly, not the end of newspapers. Most newspaper companies will adapt and survive. Some won’t, but then they’ll be replaced eventually by more efficient alternatives.
March 25, 2007 at 8:45 pm
Kyle Redinger
I continue to be suprised at the relentless and ill-informed attack on the newspaper industry.
March 25, 2007 at 8:55 pm
howardowens.com: media blog » Blog Archive » Newspapers should not expect readers to save them
[...] II: Also read Kyle Redinger on why newspapers are not dead. More facts, less rhetoric. Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where [...]
March 27, 2007 at 10:33 am
John Cribb
It’s been fashionable to say that newspapers are a sunset industry, and this thought has caught on with Wall Street. And it’s true that large metro dailies are quite troubled - they face the most intense competition and their international/national news franchise has become commoditized. However, mid and small market newspaper are quite healthy, and - as my colleague Kyle mentions - sell for strong EBITDA multiples. The trick for newspapers, of course, is monetizing their internet presence. Local news content has value, and newspapers must make sure they “brand” their news, meaning that they promote themselves as producing the highest quality complete and correct information on their local markets. Far from fading into the sunset, newspapers at worst are going to take a somewhat smaller slice of an ever growing pie.
March 28, 2007 at 3:57 pm
The Media Age » Bashing of Traditional Media Companies Is Fashionable but They Will Survive
[...] whole heartedly agree with your comments yesterday. Traditional printed based companies are still strong and have a lot of value. They aren’t going [...]
April 30, 2007 at 4:59 pm
The Media Age » Newspaper Circulation Decline is Slowing
[...] experienced a 2.1% circulation decline. I’ve already started the countdown for the next uninformed blogger to scream “newspapers are dead.” Well, they are [...]
October 30, 2007 at 9:07 am
EUGENE DEWITT
We recently analyzed the media habits of upscale boomers (Adults 45-64 in $100,000 plus households) and found that they are very heavy users of newspapers. It seems to me that newspapers are under-utilized by advertisers to reach this very important marketing segment.This bodes well for the future of newspapers if they can persuade advertisers of their marketing power. David Ogilvy once made the case for newspapers to me by saying that while they were not ‘efficient’ in media buyer terms they were extremely effective in generating sales.